Mohammad wrote: > > Yes, as Eric explained these are scientific notation. I forgot to add they > can have positive or negative sign like > > +1.23e4_dp > -1.23e4_dp > > 1.236e+5_dp > -1.23e-5_wp > It is an interesting case. Like with the dates. It can be matched quite simply by PATTERN. But the pattern will match things you might overlook.
For the specific case a "pattern-match" for a field containing a string (and only that) would be ... ^([\-+.0-9e]+_[A-Za-z]+)$ This would likely be all you'd need?? But it could be made more precise if needed. Here is a test match (and one problem) ... the green arrow -> indicates the match ... [image: Annotation 2019-08-24 205231.jpg] Its a fact regex isn't "determinate" in the same way normal code is. That can lead to much confusion. Testing against data is the best way to ensure a regex is good enough for its purpose. TT -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/46178133-fda1-4526-aed6-df2c1e00c49a%40googlegroups.com.
