Mirko, Sorry, I can't follow. Perhaps you should write it with nested lists so we can see exactly what you are after, then we can see if it can be simplified.
It may be strait forward but there is possibly some information missing from your example/question. It may be a case of you asking a question about how to fix something, rather than asking the question that led to the problem. Regards Tony On Friday, September 6, 2019 at 3:41:04 PM UTC+10, Mirko Richter wrote: > > Hi Tony, > > thanks first for your explanation! > > ref is just the name of the field that referrs to the id fetched before. > You could also write field:ref<id>. So it is a case where the *output* of > a filter-operator wouldn't be the *input* of the next but the* parameter* > of the next filter-operator. > > Regards, > Mirko > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/837d40ed-6767-4485-9590-dcbfd5dc1075%40googlegroups.com.
