> I can't *fully* match the fonts because the clock is a fragment from a > photo so I don't know what font it is.
Right. Maybe you could "bold the text part" and add a slight "haze" to approximate the clock look? FWIW, I'd vote for it because its economical and combines a succinct image of TIME with the v. number. Just thoughts TT On Tuesday, 17 September 2019 13:54:16 UTC+2, Mat wrote: > > Thanks for input TT. Before I do anything I need to know which one > qualifies at all. > But to your points: > > I can't *fully* match the fonts because the clock is a fragment from a > photo so I don't know what font it is. But I do agree it could be stretched > horizontally for better match. Other than that I find it cool that the > clock and the added digits are *not* too similar. I want there to be a > contrast so that it is clear(-er) that the information kind of piggybacks > on a real thing. Numbers are very sterile per se, little emotive meaning, > so I like to dress it up into something contextual. (I really love the > current 5.1.21 thingy... incidentally also a clock) > > <:-) > >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/09ac131e-d03c-466e-bda2-2b070ab2b30b%40googlegroups.com.
