torsdag den 19. september 2019 kl. 16.15.05 UTC+2 skrev @TiddlyTweeter: > > VERY good idea. > > (and @TonyM) thansk
I use Mal's revision of JD's tool ... > http://malsandbox.tiddlyspot.com/#%24%3A%2Fplugins%2Fmalgam%2Fversion-control > <http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fmalsandbox.tiddlyspot.com%2F%23%2524%253A%252Fplugins%252Fmalgam%252Fversion-control&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFQjCNH-ibtgKUfGX6Li3oz3nprXkaNH5w> > > *I'm crossing my fingers it might work with it too?* > It will not, but... it is a as simple as changing the filters in my modified tiddlers.. I can properly do it soon (and properly you can also do it (; ). a better solution would properly be to make a input field, to let a user define a filter of what will be included when a tiddler is deleted, that would make the trashbin more flexible.. but I dno't know if I have the skills to do that yet. > > What I like about your approach is it brings tools together. > > Thansk. I think this is a symptom of a bigger TW issue. core vs plugin! The discussion has been here before. I agree, that it is a good thing to keep the core as small as possible, but cases like this shows the weakness of plugings. I initially asked Mohammad if he could include this functionality in his plugin but he argued (and I agree), that it would be best to keep the plugin tied to the standard distribution. So I made it my self and lo and behold, now yet another cross plugin specific issue. This is why it would make some development easier, if more (relevant) plugins was made part of the core. who knows when a 3,4,6th revision plugin needs specific integration with the trashbin. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/86ee3ae7-2031-4c18-ba8c-b27122b65b71%40googlegroups.com.
