Mark S. wrote: > > ... I was thinking I would have to ditch tags, which is a shame since > Thomas' beautiful list-reveal makes > it so easy to add and remove tags. But contains:tags[Vorto] seems to work > without a noticeable performance hit. >
TW has a kinda implicit philosophy of the *Uber-Role of Tags*. Tags are doing about 85 jobs. They are for structure. They are for content signalling. They have sophisticated parsing. Personally I like the freeform taggery of tools like Twitter where #hashtag is simply an in-text string to match. I think my underlying question is "are we neglecting the text field?" Hope this is not too off-topic. Best wishes TT -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/d1a46567-b7ce-4f9c-b29e-ef46e782ae33%40googlegroups.com.
