Hi, On Wednesday, October 2, 2019 at 1:29:40 AM UTC+2, TonyM wrote:
> Mario and Coda, Thanks for the feedback. > > - I wonder how these alternates stand against my suggestion of hackability > through patchability > <https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!topic/tiddlywikidev/-aC6jWNTHdI> > . > > I did see that post, and will respond in more detail there. Short version here: With TWclassic we used "monkey patching", which creates a lot of problems <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monkey_patch#Pitfalls>. A patch always makes assumptions about how the code, that needs to be patched looks like. ... If a different, poorly written plugin has completely invalidated those assumptions, that approach will fail. The biggest problem will be debugging and maintainability. -mario -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/15ac12e8-5397-4a42-abc4-9fbc7c5a1a36%40googlegroups.com.
