When I first saw your subject I ask "Is this about..." It isn't but you might want to see this: http://tiddlyforge.com/tws/geocache.html Seems like they would go together well.
Ken Girard On Dec 6, 5:48 am, rakugo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Paul I based it on > this:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geo_(microformat)#One_class > > I'm still not convinced about the *best way* to do this and open to > changing this (as it is quite easy..!) > On Dec 5, 6:47 pm, Paul Downey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi Jon! > > > > I am looking forward to answering any questions here, hearing you're > > > feedback and seeing if anyone else in the community is interested in > > > working on this... > > > cool stuff! > > > I am wondering why the longitude and latitude is encoded in a single > > "geo" field? > > > Geotagging common convention is to use separate "geo:lat=nn.nn" and > > "geo:long=nn.nn" tags, with an additional indicator "geotagged" tag. > > > I'd be happy with "geo_lat" and "geo_long" fields as I could easily > > construct a view template to generate Geo microformat HTML: > > > http://microformats.org/wiki/geo > > > unless there's a simple way to unpick the "nn;nn" format in a view > > template? > > > Paul (psd) > > --http://blog.whatfettle.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/TiddlyWikiDev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
