I don't quite see the problem with NoScript and TiddlyWiki. I mean you've got to choose which TW site you are going to allow just like any other site too, As FND points out simply allowing sites with the title TiddlyWiki would possibly open up a security hole. For now I just can say "yes allow this (TW) site to use JavaScript and this works also on the local file system.
/HeX On 3 Jan, 09:03, FND <[email protected]> wrote: > > Probably NoScript would be modified if the developers were asked. They > > are very responsive. > > Sounds good. > As an active NoScript user, could you post a request? > > There is, however, one caveat: While TiddlyWiki itself is detectable > (window.version.title == "TiddlyWiki"), that doesn't guarantee there are > no untrustworthy plugins in the respective TW document. (We haven't come > across any malicious cases, but it might still be worth considering.) > > -- F. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/TiddlyWikiDev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
