> That is: in order to safely get a populated object from a store you > must use the return value from the get call and not rely on the > (possible) side effect of the bag object being passed to get.
I think that's a good thing, as it's more explicit - so this makes it easier to follow what's going on, without worrying about some magic happening inside a function. (Of course there might be a Bag.populate method to change the bag object in place - but I don't think that's required.) -- F. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/TiddlyWikiDev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
