On 26 Mar 2009, at 17:28, Jel wrote:

> That's 2 of us both at the same stage playing catchup - the simple
> answer is no there isn't, I had a look before wasting time, and worse,
> it's about to become redundant as the grown-ups are planning a major
> upgrade. Part of the reason is it's an open system, you just throw a
> plugin into the pot and hope it works - it doesn't always, one obvious
> reason is that there's no guarantee you won't get into Tiddler Wars
> with different plugins fighting over  who has the top overload. I hope
> they do something about that, as it's begging for viral abuse soon.
> Jel
>
> On Mar 26, 6:21 am, "Mark S." <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I've been cutting and pasting, into wiki format, the core  
>> prototyped functions out of the TW source. I had previously asked  
>> in the users forum if there already existed such a document. It  
>> just occurred to me, as I finished up the Tiddler class, that maybe  
>> I should have asked in the developers forum.


There has been discussion on irc and during our unit testing hackathon  
about formally documenting the core as a part of the jQuery  
refactoring, which could be used to generate javadoc like  
documentation, which could be useful, if nothing else to work out test  
coverage and what needs refactoring, however most developers get by  
with view-source, which isn't too bad given the size of TiddlyWiki.

I did make a start on putting together a introductory developers'  
guide for TiddlyWiki, but didn't get as far I'd like, and now think  
that developing for TW is about to get a lot easier with the advances  
made by incorporating jQuery and thus simplify the guide ..

My mention this is not intended to stop others writing documentation,  
and contributions made to http://tiddlywiki.org are always appreciated  
and could form the basis for other people, including myself, writing  
guides.

As for "viral abuse" - there is a trust when you take a plugin it's  
from a good source, and addressing that as a social problem through a  
plugin repository would seem to me to be more rewarding than, say,  
building a trusted computing platform for plugins, no?

Paul (psd)
--
http://blog.whatfettle.com


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWikiDev" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/TiddlyWikiDev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to