On Apr 4, 3:26 pm, Saq Imtiaz <[email protected]> wrote: > Of course the average "user" in that > situation is a developer, which leads to the question, what/who would > the average user be who would install a TiddlyWeb plugin?
This is a good question, which doesn't yet have a good answer. The average of anything is based on gathering data. There's not a ton of data thus far. The users so far are people who have or are willing to learn a bit of Python knowledge and a bit of networked services administration. I think the current tools work okay for those people. Not perfectly but okay. In the future I hope we'll see people using TiddlyWeb who are not like the above, but as TiddlyWeb is still being developed and changing a bit with each release, as you say, it is probably premature to bake in methodologies. The current config and administration tools that come with TiddlyWeb are explicitly built so that they can have easier to use tools built on top of them so as different classes of users evolve the tools can too. > I think it might be prudent to wait until more example of applications > built on top of TiddlyWeb, and examples of TiddlyWeb plugins are > available, before trying to implement a more rigorous approach for > plugin installation. It seems rather unclear right now as to who would > be the average person installing a TiddlyWeb plugin (developer, > administrator, end user) and therefore any solution would likely be > based on a lot of guess work. :) Exactly. Thanks for help clarifying things. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/TiddlyWikiDev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
