> do we want a thread here, or on the ticket? The ticket didn't seem to draw much attention, and this groups seems more suitable for extensive discussions.
> Although it might seem innocuous (and even somewhat elegant), the > 'local alias' technique for defining $(...) should probably be avoided > within TiddlyWiki, because it can still create conflicts That's a good point, Eric. If I understand this correctly, though, it might suffice to ensure that the $ alias is not used where eval is invoked? However, that could become a bit messy. (I'd have to think on this a little more.) > If the jQuery docs are using $j as an alternative abbreviation, then > I think that's what we should use as well. I've just brought this up on jQuery's IRC channel. People there suggest that $j is indeed the most commonly used shortcut name. > Even so, it would be good to have an abbreviation for "jQuery" would > save a considerable number of bytes in the TW core source code... We might be engaging in premature optimization here. So I'm with Paul in that I think we should defer this issue until we actually have more jQuery code in the core. However, I can see the arguments for nailing it down now. -- F. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/TiddlyWikiDev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
