hi David, If you want to use <<tiddler abc##section>> transclusion _and_ if you want to change !section to = section =
go on reading. Otherwise ignore the post. ====== I had a short look at insideTw about section, slice handling in getTiddlerText [1]. Since it is a main part of <<tiddler abc##section>> transclusion handling. And it uses tw header syntax for identification. Have a look at the source. http://www.tiddlytools.com/insideTW/#TiddlyWiki.prototype.getTiddlerText So there will be some side effects. May be you need to take care of this. -m On Sep 20, 3:46 pm, David Young <[email protected]> wrote: > > Can you post a pointer to your txt2tags syntax description. > > -m > > Of course! That completely slipped my mind from the beginning. Here's > a general listing of the txt2tags > markup:http://txt2tags.sourceforge.net/markup.html > > It has some formatting in common with tiddly. Note that the linked > document doesn't cover a popular beta markup for "tagged text": > > ''' a full line of <b>tagged</b> stuff. > > ''' > a whole block of <b>tagged</b> stuff. > ''' > > a few words on a single line of ''<b>tagged</b>'' stuff. > > Tags are functionally equivalent to <html></html> markup in tiddlywiki. > > Another confusing markup is "raw" which uses " instead of ' and simply > bypasses the txt2tags parsing of text- though any tags inside are > hidden from the output document. RAW wouldn't convert **bold** to > <b>bold</b>. RAW would still convert the input text <b>bold</b> into > <b>bold<\b> , thereby "preserving" the output text. > > My biggest concerns are the table syntax and the img/url syntax. I > think I'll be leaving the tiddly table formatter intact and see if I > can manage support for basic txt2tags table functionality. The same > for img/url syntax- though their syntax is so very similar that I > don't know if I will be able to have formatters for both > tiddly/wikiwords AND txt2tags img/url markup. In that case, I would > leave the tiddlywiki formatter in place. I don't think I can fully > replace either tables or img/url markup without having to replace > most/all of the shadow tiddlers. The same with <<macro>>, but > in-general any markup that has no equivalent in txt2tags will be left > in place. > > I may end up with an odd pidgin of txt2tags markup for all of the > "simple" text formatting things, and leave tiddly's markup alone for > the more complex/background stuff, but this is mostly intended to be > an easy plugin so that I and others like me who are used to the > txt2tags markup can use tiddly with minimal modifications to an > empty.html tiddlywiki. If I did a full replacement, I'd probably have > to keep track of tiddlywiki's development and modify my plugin much > more frequently- maybe requiring I make a derived tiddlywiki > implementation instead of a simple plugin! All for much less "reward" > in the form of markup compatibility. > > -- > David Young -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev?hl=en.
