I see. old 'bug'. Would there be a technical breakage if I were to add a few paragraph parsers for my plugin? Since I'm writing a new parser, I have little concern for backwards compatability. The example I'm starting with seems to throw <p> tags around when making new !sections (or, in the example formatter's case, new =sections= but they're both h1's). Maybe I can adapt this a bit.
http://www.martinswiki.com/%23ExampleFormatterPlugin&usg=AFQjCNHoSIQgIt4GQoIYukcaSoCsybrDmw On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 11:03 AM, FND <[email protected]> wrote: >> tiddlers output <br>s where one would expect <p>'s [...] >> Is there a reason for this implementation? > > The reasons for this are historic - unfortunately, it doesn't seem like > we can change this now without breaking backwards compatibility: > http://trac.tiddlywiki.org/ticket/34 > > > -- F. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "TiddlyWikiDev" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev?hl=en. > > -- David Young -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev?hl=en.
