> To get back to what I took as FND's original point, the issue here is
> not this one bug about jQuery, but rather how long it is taking it, 
> as an example of many bugs, to get resolved. A healthy open source 
> project "should move more rapidly and be more responsive".

That was indeed my main point - the jQuery lag is just a symptom.

> The intent is to fix ticket 472 and upgrade to the latest version of
> jQuery in the next TiddlyWiki release.

Further to the above, I currently have no idea when that release is
gonna be - I don't think anybody (including the core maintainer) does.
Extrapolating from past and current trends, I'm concerned that's gonna
be months rather than weeks.

> The move to github is an effort to shake things up, blow out the
> dust a bit, but it will not make enough of a difference if there is
> not a fundamental change in the attentiveness, accessibility and 
> responsiveness of the people responsible for the core.

+1

(Note that my intention here is not to spread pessimism, but rather to
constructively highlight significant issues.)


-- F.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWikiDev" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev?hl=en.

Reply via email to