On May 6, 10:42 am, [email protected] wrote: > > May be I am wrong and the linked tiddlers have to be interpreted in > > the sense of a) and they are "public declaration of principles and > > intentions" ... then I have to say. Some of these principles are > > really _scary_ ... for me. > > It's on this fear that I hope you will expand. Since the tiddlers I thought of, are rather printed in clay, than engraved in stone, it's not scary anymore. I'll tag my responses @april1111 :)
> If I had to guess I would imagine that you are worried because you > see TiddlyWiki being marginalized in the discussions of future > development. Is that one of the things that worries you? Not really, no. I like the "The tiddler is the thing" idea. It's true, that I like TW as a development platform. But I'd deffinitely like the following more. - Super tiny core. - Everything is a plugin. - No dependencies between plugins. - Nicely crafted API. - Absolut minimum CSS dependencies. - .. > The idea of the "notes" application is that it will operate on the > same data structures used by TiddlySpace, but with modern JavaScript > techniques to create a super fast and super simple way to create and > link notes. Those notes will be tiddlers. There are two things at tiddlywiki, wich are really essential for me. - It syncs with a serverside. - It's a downloadable, self containd, fully functional, offline document. ok. ... it's 5 points :) > > - It is very confusing (at least for me) that the manifesto displays > > "alien tiddlers". So I can't tell if they are really part of the > > manifesto, or just ideas, to be discussed. > > The manifesto itself is just ideas thus far: not yet complete. OK. We'll wait. -m -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev?hl=en.
