On Aug 18, 6:43 pm, [email protected] wrote: > I'm back now, so this stuff should get some attention in the new few > days. wb
> It would be useful if the alpha handling was a bit more automated but > we're not quite there yet, ... ok. Since alpha channel worked quite well, since it was introduced, I thought it is automated allready. So thx to chris-bot for the work done :) > ... and from my perspective any energy we were > to spend on improving the alpha release process for tiddlywiki is better > spent on the process for the other releases. Hmm. **Thinking about the latest release discussion in TW group [1].** **Thinking about the persistent cookie discussions for the last release ...** Yes .. most energy should be focused to releases But the way towards a release has to work too. As Martin said at [1] the beta process doesn't work for file TWs. Or better the community. And I think one reason could be the following: * All my file TWs contain valuable data. * I don't want to use betas with valuable data. * I don't even update them, without a reason. * So if I decide to test a beta, I test it with a "test-beta" TW ** Since a "test-beta TW" doesn't contain valuable data it is rearly used -> "not tested" I think this is a reason, why the community starts testing with releases and the reactions are quite harsh, if a release breaks stuff. -m -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev?hl=en.
