Hi Yakov
> resently I understood that some of my TiddlyWikis should be updated to
> the current version (2.6.5), but I want to review all the "functional"
> changes ("changes for users", not necessarily those ones important for
> developers). I tried to find the changelogs and found only the
> changelog at [1] which stops at v2.6.2 and the fact that v2.6.3
> "doesn't bring changes for users" (ok, let's not pick on words, no
> offence meant) [2].
OK this is a mistake, the intention is to publish a human readable
changelog with each release. Obviously the commit log in Github gives
you a blow-by-blow account of what's changed, but it's often hard to
interpret.
We'll try to sort this out for the next release; we need a checklist.
> I have many TWs and updating them all can be a long story, especially
> regarding the problems of updating reported during some time
> (although, almost all of my TWs are 2.6.0 so perhaps this wouldn't be
> an issue). So as for now I think that updating is rather "on demand"
> thing rather than "regular to do" one.
I think that that is a reasonable approach.
Best wishes
Jeremy
> (further offtopic thoughts)
> Moreover, this one more detail of the issue that rises again and
> again: sharing between TWs -- of content, of settings, of plugins and
> other extensions. While I expect that futher development of
> IncludePlugin should solve most of these problems, I can't see such
> perspective for core upgrade (probably because I'm not that familiar
> with the update engine which can be also somehow tweaked with).
>
> But afterall the following question arises: how much this "single html
> file" concept is more important than "interTW interaction and
> sharing"? Perhaps it's worth making core more like an editor for
> files? I'm absolutely for this (also because different "editors" are
> usefull for different types of devices) but here I have one big issue:
> can such approach be made without making loading TW over http even
> slower?
>
> ***
>
> I'd like to mention that "big tiddlers in Opera" bug [4] seems to be
> gone in TiddlyWiki v2.6.5. On the other hand, import doesn't work at
> all (in Opera 11.61; error message: "Error retrieving tiddlers from
> url, please ensure this url exists and is CORS enabled"); the "CORS"
> is a link to [5], but it's not as helpful, I'd expect (in fact, I
> don't understand anything there, but suspect that this is about
> importing over http while I've tried to import from a local TW). The
> same thing with FireFox 9.0.1.
>
> I tried to update one document (v2.6.0) in Opera, and got "Error with
> the new core code", the same in FireFox.
>
> Hmm.. so now the only way to update is to use Jon's TiddlyFileImportr
> [6] which worked fine for me.
>
> [1] http://trac.tiddlywiki.org/wiki/History
> [2]
> http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki/browse_thread/thread/22e0f1635cacfdf1
> [3]
> http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki/browse_thread/thread/90d8846abb931def
> [4]
> https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki/browse_thread/thread/628ae4abdc7a95ec
> , ticket (probably to be closed) at http://trac.tiddlywiki.org/ticket/1276
> [5] http://enable-cors.org/
> [6] http://repository.tiddlyspace.com/#TiddlyFileImportr
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "TiddlyWikiDev" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev?hl=en.
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWikiDev" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev?hl=en.
