You can already link to paragraphs or chapters. It's called an anchor. Anything after the hash mark in the url will scroll the page to the element with the ID in it. So, the problem is that website designers don't always give IDs to all objects. Wikipedia is the exception though... >From a random page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adventurer%27s_Fate#Cast
Just putting #Cast after the URL makes it jump to that part. On Friday, July 13, 2012 11:06:55 AM UTC-7, Yoann Babel wrote: > > Recently I've been thinking about how (great but) frustrating wikis are. > It seem's I'm not alone : > http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=mX0M19AqKQw > > My idea of the next wikis is quite different. > When I'm searching through wikipedia some kind of historic or scientific > point of view on a partucliar subjet, I'm not reading all the articles, I'm > collecting information, assembling it, and creating a new one. > A piece of this article, a piece of that one, etc... > And I create a new wiki, which is barely a "view" on the core wiki (pedia). > > What would be very interresting would be a tool (and I think it could be > an evolution or a plugin of tiddlywiki) that allows to collorate or anotate > a wiki. > A wiki page could be an anotation of other pages parts. (A kind of Aspect > oriented programming like for wikis if you want). > I'm not sure about the best way to do it technycally speaking. It would > look like hierarchical hyperlinks maybe ? > > Not just word would be linked, but paragraphs, entire chapters, and a > paragraph could be link to multiple subjects. > We could represent it by différent colors. > So, we could click on tags like "economics" on an article about houses > construction for example. > > And with something like partTiddler we could also compose by drag and > droping new tiddlers from micro-tiddlers ... and tag paragraphs/chapter > inside them. > > I'm not sure if it's quite clear. I don't know if it's easy to implement. > But I know it would be very useful for many people, not just like me. > We now have to much information to handle with current tools, we have to > think of new tools to handle the growning complexity. > > This is a kind a semantic web, but with just a new kind of link (call it > tag/context/contexutal tag ... ) > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/tiddlywikidev/-/JxN8fAJeg48J. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev?hl=en.
