I guess I wasn't clear enough. It's not a proposal, it's a 'could have been'.
Yes, it's an application but it's defined within a html page and run by a javascript capable browser. >From the home page of http://tiddlywiki.com/ TiddlyWiki is written in HTML, CSS and JavaScript ..... Looking at TiddlyEmpty*.html *line 1: <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd";> Looking at TiddlyEmpty5*.html * <!DOCTYPE html> All that effort to disable local file writes and all the subsequent effort to develop work-arounds. IF ONLY the browser file write had been conditional on a WRITABLE element in DOCTYPE, sigh! Crying over spilled milk, ~GeoD On Friday, January 18, 2013 8:25:40 AM UTC-6, PMario wrote: > > TiddlyWiki isn't a HTML page. It's an application. This wouldn't help. > -m > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/tiddlywikidev/-/Ogg-2GygRWcJ. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev?hl=en.
