I just realized that the most natural way to actully declare a slice would be...
;slice-name :slice-value ...rendering as... *slice-name* slice-value ...or perhaps... *slice-name* slice-value At least in terms of displaying stuff, this would render the cleanest output and not require using table syntax. Can anyone remember reasons why this is not used? Is it possible / would it make sense for the slices regex to (optionally?) also match such definition items? If anyone used... ;slice-name :slice-value-line-one :slice-value-line-two :slice-value-line-three ...it would be fine by me to concatenate the lot using <br /> between -- at least that's what you're already doing as an author. Cheers, Tobias. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
