Hi Stephan On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 6:31 PM, Stephan Hradek <[email protected]>wrote:
> Changing to <<< wouldn't be a problem, but I'd like to explain out, why I > choose """. > > 1. I don't like <<< because the indention is to the right, not to the > left. > 2. <<< does not support the cite that I added, so it's already > something new > 3. >, >>, >>> and so on are taken from e-mail/usenet usage, if I'm not > mistaken, so that's okay for quoting conversation-like stuff > 4. My choice """ is used to quote stuff found on other websites or > quotes from (more or less) famous people. Usually, in written text, one put > the cite in quotes which made them a natural choice for me. > > What do you think? > I do really like your proposed syntax, particularly the resonance with the use of quote marks (although I agree with Mario that they're a bit confusing to read with some fonts). It's only the backwards compatibility concern that's making me hesitate. I'd suggest that the cite part be parsed as everything after the closing <<<, for example: <<<.myClass Quote <<< Citation text [[including]] wikitext Best wishes Jeremy -- Jeremy Ruston mailto:[email protected] -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
