> I think, we don't need a new filter syntax. We need better documentation > for the existion one. >
We need enhancements for the existing one. Tell me how to filter for one of the custom fields I called "is", "sort", "links", "prefix"… > Atm it is one page [1] TiddlerFilters. > But here I agree… The documentation needs enhancement. > The filter syntax parser may need some adjustments too, to make everything > consistent. eg: whitespace for readability should not disable the filter > function. > I also agree here. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
