That is what the let widget does.
I don't understand why the set widget is so limited. Jeremy is a very
skilled programmer so I don't understand the limitation of this widget.
El domingo, 20 de abril de 2014 22:19:50 UTC+2, PMario escribió:
>
>
> If you edit your $:/core/ui/ViewTemplate like this, it defines the outer
> tw-tiddler-frame div
> be aware: there are 3 <$set...> widgets now. so all 3 have to be closed
> too?
>
>
> \define frame-classes()
> tw-tiddler-frame tw-tiddler-view-frame $(missingTiddlerClass)$
> $(shadowTiddlerClass)$ $(systemTiddlerClass)$ $(bg)$
> \end
> <$set name="bg" value={{!!bg-class}} ><$set name="storyTiddler"
> value=<<currentTiddler>>><$set name="tiddlerInfoState" value=<<qualify
> "$:/state/tiddlerInfo">>><$tiddler tiddler=<<currentTiddler>>><div
> class=<<frame-classes>>><$list
> filter="[all[shadows+tiddlers]tag[$:/tags/ViewTemplate]!has[draft.of]]"
> variable="listItem"><$transclude tiddler=<<listItem>>/></$list>
> </div>
> </$tiddler></$set></$set></$set>
>
>
> @Jermelone
> It would be nice, if the set widget could set several variables at once.
>
> -mario
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWikiDev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
