Hi Mario

The rough plan for deprecating an API or module is:

* Move the existing implementation to a plugin
* Add a log function that displays a message in the console "Deprecated
function/feature used", along with enough information to track down where
the issue occurred
* Distribute the deprecated-functions plugin as part of the core

But that's really for when we're out of the beta; before the beta we can
change things more freely. And I'm not suggesting that we do that in this
particular case: we'll keep the existing `list` filter as a shortcut, and
augment it with one or more new filters that provide the required
functionality.

Best wishes

Jeremy.




On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 12:53 PM, PMario <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> From: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/tiddlywiki/915nysD7h1c
>
> On Tuesday, June 17, 2014 9:17:04 AM UTC+2, Jeremy Ruston wrote:
>>
>> Hi Stephan
>>
>> > I have the feeling, the consistency is lost here.
>>
>> The "list" operator was implemented back before the filter syntax allowed
>> indirect operands.
>>
>> As I said above, I agree that the `list` filter operator is broken.
>> However we need to fix it by introducing a new filter operator, rather than
>> breaking backwards compatibility of the existing operator.
>>
>
> Backwards compatibility is a good thing and everyone should try very hard
> to achieve this goal, but IMO there needs to be a "defined" way, how we are
> going to deprecate stuff.
>
> I think end-users have no problem, if something changes for the better,
> but they don't like it, if there is an unexpected shutdown.
>
> I think, there should be some thoughts about "how we are going to
> deprecate core functions" in TW5. ... There was some related discussion in
> very early hangouts. ...
>
> In TWc deprecating core functions didn't work, for several reasons, which
> imo caused extended need for support, support, support ...
> With TW5 we should do better. ...
>
>
> So my thoughts looks like this:
>
>  * Information is key!
>    * Devs and power users need a single source of information, that tells
> them, if something needs to be deprecated and what changes in the future.
>    * Deprecated functions need a possibility to tell users and dev's, that
> they want to be updated. eg: console.log messages.
>    *
>
>  * It seems to be common practice, that a major change from eg: Version
> 1.x.y to 2.0.0 are the points in time, to remove / change a software core
> behavor.
>    * Incompatibilities imo are allowed only at major changes.
>
>  * deprecated core functions are packaged into plugins, and the
> deprecation is announced, long before the functionality is changed. So
> actually nothing changed for the end-user
>    * For dev's and extended users, there needs to be a good description,
> what's needed to move forward.
>    * The "deprecated plugin" needs to have a possibility, to tell the user
> / developer, that it wants to be removed. eg: some console.log output.
>
>  * When the announced milestone is reached, deprecated plugins are moved
> out of the core repo, into there own repo.
>    * So including plugins from there means, there is no "core" support
> anymore, but an outdated TW keeps working.
>    * So support is moved from core members to the user ...
>
> Just some thoughts.
> What do you think?
>
> have fun!
> mario
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "TiddlyWikiDev" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>



-- 
Jeremy Ruston
mailto:[email protected]

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWikiDev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to