Maybe we can have two indexes, one for all tiddlers and other per folder, and load one or the other based on the request. The only drawback here is that the have to write each tiddler save to two indexes.
El miércoles, 3 de diciembre de 2014 12:45:49 UTC+1, Tobias Beer escribió: > > > >> This is useful when you want to check tiddlers by folder, but not much >> efficient when you want to list all the tiddlers. Maybe we should not >> provide the ability to fetch all the tiddlers but only based on folders. >> That's why folders are used for. In which scenario would you like to get >> all tiddlers in a drive folder? I think in sub-folders as a way to separate >> wiki contents. >> > > If your adapter had the ability to configure a number of sources, in the > simplest form "folders" (later perhaps also different "drives", then each > folder would be queried by a simple mechanism that only asks for a name => > id pair. Meaning: you would have one index per folder, rather than one for > all. > > Best wishes, Tobias. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
