> > > Why would there be (more) collisions with than with using jQuery tiddlers? >
What are jQuery tiddlers? > What do you expect to collide with what? > Not with names, but maybe accessing and modifying dom nodes. TW has its own way to modify the DOM and jQuery has a different one. > ...besides multiple plugins racing to install their own version of jQuery, > which none of them should, I think. > I agree > > Loading such libraries should be a plugin-agnostic step, imho, not part of > a plugin. > > Most of the plugins are a port of a popular library or based on a popular library, so I have to disagree with you. A javascript library can not be ported to TW without adaptations. > Why not? Macros are also initialized on startup, are they not? > As with Galleria, I need a macro anyways so as to run that code that > requires jQuery. > > I'm not sure, but I don't think macros are initialized on startup. That is what startup modules are for. Macros are just functions that returns plain text. They should not modify the dom or the tiddlers store. And no, you don't need a macro for Galleria, you need a widget. I know the widgets development could be scary, but it is not so hard and it is the correct way of doing things. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
