@Jeremy thank you for you anwer! I just tested using a link to a static tiddler as a _canonical_uri - and Aaah! the result is just so much slicker than a tiddler permalink for a _canonical_uri.
> If not already possible, I believe this would be a useful addition for us >> because it would, for instance, be easy to embed and refer to it, >> particularly for discussions on the boards. New member Alec Perkey also >> mentioned that it might be advantageous for SEO. >> > > The SEO thing that I don't understand is how google understands the > relationship between the front page of a blog that contains many posts, and > the individual post URLs. > In this post <https://groups.google.com/d/msg/tiddlywiki/swsmTlE4kg0/OJaGDIBo1KIJ>, new member Alec Perkey indicates he might have some knowledge on the matter. If SEO treats individual URLs positively for ranking, then I guess "static" (i.e including keywords in each tiddler) might really be a key to show up in search. BTW, looking at the code for /prerelease and for /empty, I fail to find anything when seraching for terms "keyword" and "meta-tag" - am I missing something or is there simply no such thing? Alec suggests that individual users put keywords in their own TWs... but/and it would make more sense if they were in core, or? There could be a field in controlpanel, similar to the defaulttiddlers field, listing keywords by default. This would make it open and super easy to change or just delete for anyone who prefers so. <:-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
