Hi Danielo > > I updated the deleteTiddler function, first with a dummy definition and it > started to work. But as a side effect the draft tiddlers remained there. I > modified the code to do real deletion of tiddlers and it is working > perfectly right now. I updated the gist. I have single tiddler files!! > hooray! Now the loading part is missing. >
Excellent, well done. > What would be the better way to provide skinny tiddlers? Does it makes > sense at all? Because I have to read the whole file in order to give the > skinny definition there is no advantage of using just a skeleton tiddlers. > I worked before with loading tiddlers from the FS and it was a total > disaster. Any advice will be very welcome. > The skinny tiddler infrastructure might work well if you use separate .meta files; you ought to be able to just read the .meta files. You'll want .meta file support in any case for saving images in a useful format. In any event, if you do find yourself able to return a 'text' field in the skinny tiddlers response, you should do so; the client code will be happy. Best wishes Jeremy. -- Jeremy Ruston mailto:[email protected] -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywikidev/CAPKKYJaVwc%3D-%2BjZ0%3DooEwGEhu3F1oZnb3J4ef-A675tEyOzz%3Dw%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
