On Saturday, January 28, 2017 at 12:44:40 PM UTC+1, Mat wrote: > > Thank you - BUT to clarify: My question was really only about where I > could see the *explicit mention of "BSD-3clause*". Of course, it is the > license content that is legally crucial but in my (limited) experience, the > name of the license is useful to state explicitly for e.g license > comparisons and overall to give a feeling that "OK, they're using the > established standard, no tricky fine print." >
You are right. .. It should be more visible. .... but ... The name of the license is just a "hint". The content is important. ... If you want: the "fine print" It also doesn't matter, if you can see the license at a prominent place. It's important, that it's there. see: view-source:http://tiddlywiki.com/ which can only be seen if you open the TW source. .. It's kind of hidden but valid! But as I wrote, we should improve this. > So, I'm hoping for *"BSD-3clause*" to appear in both github and on > tiddlywiki.com. I'm including a tid file here as a PR. > IMO there's no need to include the text several times. Once is enough. It's already there, <https://github.com/Jermolene/TiddlyWiki5/blob/master/core/copyright.tid>to produce the html file, it's just not linked in a visible way! -mario -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywikidev/3148e0b3-18e2-444a-a9ef-ab804f3f0878%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
