On Saturday, September 9, 2017 at 5:14:29 AM UTC-5, Mat wrote: > > I would also like for this (actually, I've even made this suggestion > myself, but I fail to find where). > > IMO tiddlers, as they're currently manifested, are not general enough to > be "the smallest semantically meaningful unit > <http://tiddlywiki.com/#Philosophy%20of%20Tiddlers>". IMO, what is "the > smallest" *depends on context *- but at the very atomic level it must be > the *field*. > > Right. Tiddlers are objects.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywikidev/c0b645e7-469b-4a9a-9c53-6443f917d9c7%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
