Arlen, On simple way to group pages [should be tiddlers] according to "folders".
Did you look closer at the tree macro https://tiddlywiki.com/#tree%20Macro%20(Examples) Which branches on "/" See treemacro.jpg Which I have also cloned and customised to a date tree breaking on "-" Also example Attached. see datetree.jpg I then went on to customise the tree macro to show wikilinks, Tagging / TagPill (using a modified <<tag>> macro <<tree prefix:"$:/core">> See my example attachwed coretree.jpg What else is missing in your view? Tony On Wednesday, 18 October 2017 00:59:31 UTC+11, Arlen Beiler wrote: > > I should have made it clearer that these are three unrelated ideas > > >> I have been thinking about this for a while now. It seems like we should >> have some way of being able to transclude tiddlers from other wikis. And we >> should have a syntax that makes this easy. This one might be better done as >> a plugin. > > > I'm thinking that the NodeJS server command would be useful as the > server-side component for this one. I know federation has also done this, > but it involves loading the client wiki into an iframe. I guess that could > work fine in some cases, but it is definitely more data to transfer. The > TiddlyWeb spec looks daunting to implement in some ways. You're right, > TiddlyWeb is probably the way to go on this one. I was thinking more in > terms of transcluding individual tiddlers, so recipes and filters might be > overkill. > > Another thing I have been thinking is that we need a simple way to group >> pages [should be tiddlers] according to "folders". Maybe all this entails >> is a macro like TOC that lists all the folders under a prefix. It seems >> like a filter of some sort should work. >> > > For this one, I am talking about tiddlers within one wiki. I'm thinking of > the way the Mediawiki software gives you the option to treat slashes in the > page title like a folder path. When you enable this option, as Wikipedia > does, it will treat page titles with slashes as a subpage. So in our case, > we would write a macro that looks like the TOC macro, but groups the > tiddlers using the title field instead of tags. For instance, the shadow > tiddlers of the core plugin would look like this: > > $:/core > > - modules > - macros > - parsers > - startup > - utils > - widgets > - templates > - ui > - Buttons > - ControlPanel > - EditorToolbar > > > Another thing that would be nice is the ability to add preset fields to >> the edit template between the title and the body. That way I could specify >> that I always want the caption field available, for instance, even if >> nothing has been specified for that field yet. > > > I mean, we could just give this the same functionality as the field editor > below the body, where it would have the field name preset, but you would > still need to click create before it would actually save the value. Or > require the user to click create before it will show the value edit box. > Would that work? This is something I run into quite a bit with some of my > wikis, and I usually figure I'm not the only one. > > Thoughts? > Arlen > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywikidev/dd6c08c7-a06c-4137-b15c-3f01a41b52d0%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
