On Thursday, January 11, 2018 at 1:38:33 PM UTC+1, Simon Huber wrote: > > negative and floating numbers with a certain limitation in accuracy would > also be great >
IMO negative numbers can be created with [addprefix[-]] floating point will be a problem. eg: 0 -> 99.99 will create about 10,000 numbers. So users will create endless loops, without being aware. But you could use nested INTs. I was thinking about a syntax like: [create[1..100#04]] ... which would mean: start: 1 .. including 1 stop: 100 .. including 100 format: #04 means use leading zeros use 4 digits which would result in 0001 ... 0100 with every number in between format: 1..100#03 means 001 ... 100 format: 1..100 means 1 ... 100 format: 33..55#03 means 033 ... 055 and so on. Just some thoughts. No promises. The problem now is, that "start" stop may be variables. ... like [create<start>..<stop>#<format>] ... which is ugly, complex and the parser can't handle it at the moment. -m -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywikidev/0fc29ee8-b46a-4205-9146-d4c1ea3dc8b3%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
