> > Mat: Nobody can know this yet.
I disagree. I DO think it is important a few people, TW "experts", examine it to make sure its broad enough. But to say "Nobody can know" is just silly. > Twitter has that fixed number of characters limit so if, for some reason, > sharing typically ends up as tweets then that would of course affect what > is "best format". Just not possible to know at this stage. > FYI, Twitter in now 280. It will fit fine. I'd make sure in my case. IF somebody else made another 500 I could use that were longer that 280 total, those I'd edit in Tweet. Easy. It may also depend on *what people want to do with it: * No. A definition of what data is essential to adequately capture a resource should be as wide as seems doable. That leaves end users free to do what they want. They don't define it. They use it. As I said, lets get on with it. Josiah -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywikidev/827e903a-f633-49d0-87b9-0ab9d16c57b7%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
