On Thursday, 27 December 2018 12:47:48 UTC+1, @TiddlyTweeter wrote: > > Ciao Riz & Joe > > 1 - Riz. Great practical comment. Some time ago you did some really neat > experiments for static output that was more "integrative" looking than > https://tiddlywiki.com/static/. Tw.com static can come over as a series of > pages, not an integrated site. In fact the base address can give a 404 > error. It needs a Tiddler name to find anything since there is no "home" > as such ... e.g. https://tiddlywiki.com/static/HelloThere works but its > home doesn't... > > 2 - The Google Indexing issue is perhaps worth further exploration? TW can > add headers that mildly encourage/improve it for the dynamic version? > > 3 - The issue of "static site" via node generation I find somewhat > confusing, ultimately. What I really want is to be able to auto-generate > with "some JS dynamism". > > 4 - Tiddlyspot is not indexed by Google, as far as I know, so zillions of > TW we don't know about. >
Is that true? - when I get stuck I Google for solutions to my problems - this often works when the "search" inside my local TW fails. I've found a lot of good TW content via Google. /Joe > > Just thoughts > Josiah > > On Thursday, 27 December 2018 09:39:16 UTC+1, Riz wrote: >> >> Hi Joe, >> >> I see you are enjoying your TW5 quite well. Here is a thought for your >> consideration. The basic TW5 you download from GitHub or tiddlywiki.com >> is a good fit for several things. Unfortunately the idea of using >> Tiddlywiki itself as a blog has a major downside. The unique structure and >> data storage of TW5 doesn't fly well with the search engine optimisation >> guidelines of most search engines. Here's an experiment. The most popular >> website using Tiddlywiki is obviously tiddlywiki.com itself. Now search >> Google for "Tiddlywiki HelloThere". You will see that large part of links >> point to tiddlywiki.com/static/, which are not Tiddlywiki files, but >> static HTML generated by Tiddlywiki. >> >> Ergo, if you are serious about using TW5 for blogging, use it not as blog >> itself, but as a static site generator, a role for which Tiddlywiki is one >> of the best fits. >> >> There was a "blog edition Tiddlywiki" as a part of core. However I cannot >> find it in github right now. >> >> Sincerely, >> Riz >> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywikidev/79c9650d-fc25-476e-be7a-0649ff9dba16%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
