David,
Irrespective of the format generated by the WikiText table format the
original html format also works well in TiddlyWiki, so it is trivial to use
that method instead and you can use whatever standards you wish. Personally
I find html easier to wrap the detail rows in a list widget, even the
columns can be handled this way.
Regards
Tony
On Monday, 18 March 2019 02:52:36 UTC+11, David Nebauer wrote:
>
> Thanks, Mario. I presume html gurus routinely construct their stylesheets
> that way. The rest of us mere mortals, however, are not always that wise.
> Naive users of TW creating css may assume table header cells use th tags,
> and TW-specific stylesheets may not support tables that use th tags for
> header cells (as with the stylesheets in the Shiraz plugin). It leads to
> unnecessary troubleshooting and tweaking of macros and stylesheets.
>
> This is not a huge problem in the great scheme of things, just annoying
> when you encounter it.
>
> Cheers,
> David.
>
> On Monday, 18 March 2019 00:40:48 UTC+9:30, PMario wrote:
>>
>>
>> That shows one problem that would be involved in changing the table html:
>>> existing css that handles only thead > td would "break". Still, I'd
>>> argue it is better to go through that experience once to have more
>>> intuitively correct html output.
>>>
>>
>> That's "just" a problem of having the right CSS style definitions. eg:
>>
>> table thead tr td, table th {
>> background-color: #f0f0f0;
>> font-weight: bold;
>> }
>>
>> And you are good to go.
>>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWikiDev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywikidev/9dec49ea-8fe5-4431-ab70-af3dabcddc9d%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
