On Wednesday, April 3, 2019 at 10:05:38 AM UTC+2, Jeremy Ruston wrote: > > Hi Yakov > > I'll start with TiddlyFox since it is still used by many users (with > either FireFox 56- or Pale Moon, WaterFox and other FF forks). One thing > about it is building the xpi: I've read about building it a little and the > crucial quesion is: is it still possible to create signed xpi, or updating > TiddlyFox is impossible in principle? > > > Mozilla was responsible for signing the extension as part of the process > of uploading it; I don’t think there’s ever been a way for anyone else to > sign it and have it accepted by recent versions of Firefox. But I don’t > know much about it, it may be worth asking on the Mozilla dev mailing lists. >
It's NOT possible to sign old XPI addOns with the existing Mozilla AMO. ... Addons.mozilla.org (AMO) see: - About Firefox AddOns <https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/about> ... some basic info to start with - Signing and dirstributing AddOns <https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Add-ons/Distribution> ... more Developer related info. - OUTDATED info about XPI <https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Archive/Add-ons/Signing_an_XPI> signing If you present a XPI to AMO it will be rejected. have fun! mario -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywikidev/5d789f56-2549-425a-b0fc-53c031439874%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
