Jeremy Ruston wrote: > > > As it happens, I have been wondering recently if enabling duplicates > within filters might not be exactly the sort of change that warrants moving > to 5.2.x: >
@Jermolene - a suggestion: If I understand things right, the dupes issue is holding back the new math operators which consequentially holds back the release of 5.1.20. Might an idea be to *postpone* the math ops to get a release of 5.1.20? I'm screaming "nooo" inside but I understand the dilemma and 5.1.20 is already late as it is plus the prerelease still has some *really *useful new stuff. Then head for a super exciting 5.2.x by starting with a discussion and collecting suggestions. It is a rare opportunity and it would be really unfortunate if great ideas miss out and have to wait for yet another backwards-incompatible moment, possibly many years away. BTW, there are already a few things listed in an old roadmap <https://tiddlywiki.com/prerelease/#RoadMap> that I'm not sure are in the backwards breaking list mentioned in this thread but that still would be very useful. In reply to @TiddlyTweeters footnote; I also think CSS is one of the areas that need more love. IMO we see *very* little variations in TW appearences. IMO, CSS is a kind of poor mans coding to affect how things appear so I suspect the big JS-boys here don't fully appreciate this need for us non-JS mortals. <:-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywikidev/c50d2de9-17be-498f-8809-4c229c6d9a49%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
