@Jeremy, thanks for reply! BTW, what happens when tiddlers are *folded*? Is their content somehow removed from the tree? Should that be sufficient to solve the issue? (I'm trying to test it but my computer is currently messing with me so I can't draw conclusions.)
@Tony > I think there is a way to abstract the result of a list into a somewhat > static tiddler and display that instead. A tiddler that will not be > refreshed. > That sounds more like a "construct" than a "temporary state". I lack the knowledge to theorize implications properly but I'm thinking it should be more economical to just "block the refresh" rather than to actually do or construct something to display alternative things...? <:-) > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywikidev/fe3ef132-ac1f-49a3-989c-316f51981b5c%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
