TonyM wrote:
>
> does this sound good?
>

Thanks for input Tony!

I'd for sure be interested to see it if you make it but my point is that 
this all should be easier in native TW (albeit possibly with a core macro) 
because it is such a common user need. 

Side note: This keeps happening; I point out a "weakness" in TW, not a 
problem I have myself, and (very) good hearted fellow tiddlywikians come 
with proposals to help me *personally*. I appreciate this very much but 

   1. I must learn to make it much clearer that/when I'm not asking for 
   personal help 
   2. solving native TW weaknesses with "community plugins" would be okay 
   IF(!!!!) we had a good infrastructure that made all plugins accessible in 
   one place. In contrast to us reading this, non-geeks should not have to 
   spend a lot of time and frustration on the boards looking for solutions to 
   common problems that a "note taking tool" / "knowledge base" / "wine 
   data-base" etc should solve.  (...and, no, the individual initiatives to 
   collect all plugins is not sufficient as they outdate and rot. Time has 
   proven again and again that this is not a one man job, which is why I don't 
   take initiative to report my creations to them.) Until then, unofficial 
   plugins are IMO just not a good answer to "weaknesses" in TW.

<:-)


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWikiDev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywikidev/736a7835-ed67-4e19-80e8-84ea6c679e35%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to