I am all for role your own wikis checkbox driven etc but I believe for new users we need more than empty and we need empty or a minimal version as a base.
Including contents for example helps new users understand and organise even simple info from the start. However my main point is if we bifuricated, split the primary distributions across these lines we would spend less time concerned with what is standard, core or not core and more placing appropriate content in the appropriate edition. This includes the facility to selectively install and remove plugins. Or build your own edition tools. I think such an approach would also encourage people to investigate or offer functionally alternative editions not just specific editions as at present. Current editions are bespoak solutions, I believe we need a small subset of official editions designed by the community to meet community needs and support adoption and rapid development needs. These would be quite simple to manage as forks of the minimal version with a well structured github environment. Just my view of course and towards a consensus. Tony -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywikidev/ad76ff7e-df99-403d-b8f4-43af1299b6d0%40googlegroups.com.
