Hi Mat, 

A nice idea! ... But pardon me, being so harsh: It won't work. ... 

As a developer I'd rather risk a performance hit using inline comments than 
maintaining 2 different sources of truth. Keeping them in sync will always 
fail.

-----------

What would be possible is a "pre-compile" step  while building TW. But this 
would only be available for a node based TW development setup, where the 
comments would automagically create a "comments-library" that could be 
imported to annotate the source code. 

This annotation would need a special editor, that can handle the additional 
info. ... All of this "solutions" are way to complicated. So at the end I 
personally would go with "no comments" but proper indentation, which make 
the code more readable. 

Creating PRs with, *backwards compatible*, indented core files *and *getting 
the changes merged is hard enough.

-mario

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWikiDev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywikidev/07c8001d-5c8a-4428-b803-23f35235ce62%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to