Testing the demo: I find it surprisingly robust but it is also tricky to come up with varied tests, even if I did perform quite a few by now. Here are some findings so far:
1. Pop up position: Creating a new row seems to take presedence and steer where the popups shows. I get this bug(?) to most consistently show if the text *starts out* with empty rows, then the popup shows in that area rather than where the title is completed. 2. I can't find it in this thread now but I think you mentioned that: The popup doesn't follow the caret if it is moved using the keyboard arrows and then typing. 3. If the text already has the closing brackets, e.g [[bar]] and you stand just to the right of the "r" and pick e.g title "barbaz", then you get [[barbaz]]]] - i.e if there's a closing "]]" they should probably be removed at injection. 4. Possibly not relevant at this moment: After the injection, it is desirable that focus - i.e the caret - is returned to where the text was just inserted. Currently one has to click to insert caret. Other tests like inserting normally problematic characters or repeated incomplete strings or using titles of existing tiddlers that have erroneous characters in them seem to work well. Are there any ready built "test tiddlers" with typically problematic text or faulty fields, including faulty titles, that people use when testing these things? Or maybe each case is so different that its not worth having such things. <:-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywikidev/acf3a738-46fa-4ba9-abdc-6028a5bf99c1o%40googlegroups.com.
