Thanks for replying PMario. This would mean, that TW would have to be a "full blown" Git-client with a > lot of "magic". ... I'm not sure if we want to go that route.
Why? My main point was if it is possible to eliminate the need for the user to face gh - other than possibly the initiator/owner of the repo (but ideally not even that person). For example, the steps currently required for making PRs for the TW docs (as opposed to code) is "too much gh" for what I'm asking about. It would not be a problem that a "full blown Git-client" has a lot of magic because the intended user (i.e the vast majority of TW users) would not need to understand nor fiddle with the internals of it anyway. The user is reasonably presumed to be interested in TW and the collaboration project he takes part in, nothing else. <:-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywikidev/649add0f-c865-47ad-add1-475cf5cf33beo%40googlegroups.com.
