Saq,
 

>  Perhaps targetTiddler instead of editedTiddler?


Will change.
 

>  I think a user you expect to write regular expressions, can also be 
> expected to read docs and use em-trigger instead of trigger.
>

:P I'll change it. 

$:/plugins/EditorMagic/styles


OK, so my point was more if I can modify the styles you added - which I now 
interpret as "yes".
 

> Arrow keys do not change the content.
>>
> I already wrote JS that resolves this some days ago, but the downside is 
> it makes the action-popupcaret widget much less generic.
>

Ah, I mistook the mere pressing of a key to be what fired the action. 
Anyway, could perhaps your JS be an "addon" *to* the action-popupcaret 
widget, so it doesn't modify it? Maybe if there are hooks in the widget 
(I'm probably using the term 'hooks' wrong).
 

>  
>
>> 3) The recursive macro and what it solves:
>>
> As far as I know we don't have any other easier and efficient way to save 
> variables for every step of a list widget run, have them persist and 
> update, and compare them afterwards.
>

(JS?)

I don't see an issue with complexity here as users of the tool would not 
> need to tinker with this, unless you don't feel comfortable enough with it 
> to maintain the code?
>

OK, I think it'll be fine. 

Thank you!

<:-)

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWikiDev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywikidev/cb7749ba-0971-4c5c-ad1b-e06b5bb0d4e0o%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to