Mario - Thanks for the tip - I'll give that a shot!
-Rob On Monday, September 7, 2020 at 3:03:55 PM UTC-5 PMario wrote: > On Monday, September 7, 2020 at 9:04:18 PM UTC+2, [email protected] wrote: > .. > >> Instead, I'm wondering if shifting the rendering of many tiddlers that >> match a filter into the background might be a useful hack in this case, and >> I don't think it would be *too *hard to do. There could be a >> <$lazy-list> widget that could run a filter, store its results, and then >> transcludes a temporary tiddler. In the background, a timer would take a >> couple results from the filter at a time and render them to the temporary >> tiddler, building it up dynamically. In my experience, it's the rendering >> that takes up much of the time when building large lists of tiddlers like >> this. >> > > Hi Rob, > > You are right. Filtering isn't the "time consuming" task. It's building > and drawing the DOM. Especially if you do a > > list [all[]] ... In your case it will create 8700 links, where you can > only read may be 50 at the same time. > > You should experiment with the tiddlywiki/dynaview plugin ... I did create > a version. see attachment > > IMO it will be much more effective then optimizing filters and drawing > stuff that is nod visible. > > -mario > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywikidev/2d5edcc6-63c0-44d1-b47c-c535f956926dn%40googlegroups.com.
