That does make a lot more sense. :) On Thursday, November 5, 2020 at 2:55:33 AM UTC-5 TonyM wrote:
> Corey > > Perhaps such a library of tools could be helpful, but a lot can already be > done by building a tiddler in which what you see is what you get, open it > in a new window and print to pdf. Especially if you include page breaks in > the display. I like foxit reader as even the free version provides > extensive mark-up on pdfs. Sometimes it is better to make use of a > specialist solution in conjunction with tiddlywiki?. > > Regards > Tony > > > On Tuesday, 3 November 2020 18:19:54 UTC+11, Corey Woodworth wrote: >> >> I wonder if there'd be a demand for a pdf.js >> <https://mozilla.github.io/pdf.js/> powered plugin to turn completed >> tiddlywikis into PDFs >> >> On Saturday, September 26, 2020 at 3:24:15 PM UTC-4 PMario wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> That's a very interesting topic. Printing books has been developed and >>> improved since about 500 years. .. HTML and the internet was able to >>> "destroy" it in 20 years. .. In the last may be 10 years the standardizing >>> groups try to implement elements from "printed media" into "web media" >>> >>> We got new HTML/CSS elements like flexbox, grid, masking and others, >>> that allow us to improve and control the layout of a web page. ... BUT we >>> are still miles away from printing a good looking page, directly from the >>> browser. >>> >>> We need to convert HTML to TeX with 3rd party tools, to be able to get a >>> good looking printed page, that we can read with joy as a PDF. .. No trees >>> need to die ;) >>> >>> -mario >>> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywikidev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywikidev/7122d1b7-ba16-48fc-bab4-461adde068f6n%40googlegroups.com.
