"The performance of compression in libtiff is rather dependent on
strip/tile sizes. Have you investigated modifying strip/tile sizes to
see if more can be gained from existing codecs?"

Also "separate" images might be worth a try, where R, G, and B are in
separate strips rather than stored as RGB.

On Fri, Nov 28, 2025 at 6:32 AM Bob Friesenhahn via Tiff <
[email protected]> wrote:

> I have not heard of anyone working on QOI or FFV1 compression in
> libtiff.  If the work is performed suitably well (according to project
> standards) and there is some assurance of continued support, the usage
> license matches libtiff's license, and there is some assurance of
> development support for some time after integration, the work is likely
> to be integrated.
>
> The performance of compression in libtiff is rather dependent on
> strip/tile sizes. Have you investigated modifying strip/tile sizes to
> see if more can be gained from existing codecs?
>
> Have you tried WebP compression in libtiff? There is lossless WebP
> support in libtiff!  WebP compression should work rather well provided
> that the image is a natural scene.  WebP does not support large images,
> but it should work well if a large image is diced up into tiles.
>
> Bob
>
> On 11/28/25 08:01, Romeyke, Andreas via Tiff wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > For our long-term archive, we are considering switching from baseline
> > TIFF 6.0 to a successor format that can efficiently compress images
> > losslessly. To minimize conversion issues, one option would be to
> > simply change the codec within TIFF. We've seen that "tiffcp" supports
> > lzw, lzma, and zstd.
> >
> > Compared to the lossless encoding in Quite OK Image File Format (qoi),
> > PNG, and especially compared to FFV1 or JPEG XL, the achievable
> > compression rates are suboptimal[1].
> >
> > Therefore, our question is:
> >
> > Is there an overview of which codecs libtiff currently supports?
> >
> > And is anyone already working on integrating qio or FFV1?
> >
> > If not, would such extensions have a chance of being incorporated into
> > libtiff?
> >
> > With best regards
> >
> > Andreas
> >
> > [1] our testset (scans historic monographs) results in ff. lossless
> > compression ratios:
> >
> > tiff/lzw – 94%
> >
> > tiff/zstd – 67%
> >
> > qoi – 50%
> >
> > png – 53%
> >
> > ffv1 – 36%
> >
> > jpeg-xl – 33%
> >
> > --
> >
> > team member “long-term preservation“
> >
> > Saxon State- and University Library Dresden (SLUB)
> >
> > Department 2 (IT), Division 2.3 (infrastructure and digital long-term
> > preservation)
> >
> > Zellescher Weg 18 | 01069 Dresden
> >
> > phone: +49 351 4677 763
> >
> > E-Mail: [email protected]
> > <mailto:[email protected]>
> >
> > http://www.slub-dresden.de/ <http://www.slub-dresden.de/> | @slubdresden
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Tiff mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/tiff
> _______________________________________________
> Tiff mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/tiff
>
_______________________________________________
Tiff mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/tiff

Reply via email to