Hi again,

yes a rc4 was needed. It consists of, compared to rc3:

- reverting the JBIG rc3 change that seems to introduce a new vulnerability: https://gitlab.com/libtiff/libtiff/-/merge_requests/914

- revert the rc3 change related to byte-swapping that apparently causes some legit images to be incorrectly decoded: https://gitlab.com/libtiff/libtiff/-/merge_requests/915 . Side effect is that bug https://gitlab.com/libtiff/libtiff/-/work_items/795 will be re-opened. Good luck to anyone trying to fix it without causing regressions :-)

- a minor rst formatting fix: https://gitlab.com/libtiff/libtiff/-/merge_requests/913

New RC tarballs at:

- https://download.osgeo.org/libtiff/tiff-4.7.2rc4.tar.gz
- https://download.osgeo.org/libtiff/tiff-4.7.2rc4.tar.xz
- https://download.osgeo.org/libtiff/tiff-4.7.2rc4.zip

I let another PSC member raise the motion to adopt it, as it seems my attempts at doing so don't bring favorable fate :-)

(despite the frustration of having to iterate on this release, thanks to all those who have tested it and reported. Given the unusual amount of activity since last release, and our known to be quite partial test suite, it is quite expected we hit regressions)

Even

--
http://www.spatialys.com
My software is free, but my time generally not.
LLMs contribute to global warming and brain rot

_______________________________________________
Tiff mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/tiff

Reply via email to