On Thu, 26 Feb 2009 13:40:15 +0100 Adam Tkac <at...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 12:49:58PM +0100, Pierre Ossman wrote: > > > > The problem is that the code is very macro happy, so a basic profiler > > will not easily tell you where the cycles are spent. If you dig a bit > > more you'll see that the primary bottle neck is PREPARE_JPEG_ROW() (on > > the server at least). > > > > (Related to that, would anyone mind if I got rid of most of that macro > > freak show and implemented things in a bit more normal way?) > > Feel free to perform any cleanup. > This seems to be a style inherited from RealVNC. As such, any major cleanup will mean that vendor drops won't be as easy when it comes to the encoder/decoder parts. Is this still okay with everyone? Rgds -- Pierre Ossman OpenSource-based Thin Client Technology System Developer Telephone: +46-13-21 46 00 Cendio AB Web: http://www.cendio.com
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H
_______________________________________________ Tigervnc-devel mailing list Tigervnc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tigervnc-devel
